Initial assessment
We separate a KYC rejection from SoF after DeFi and from a P2P hold, using the request that is open now.
We review a failed KYC, a second identity check, and origin requests after a Uniswap deposit. The file set follows the notice.
Pick the closest scenario. The assessment compares the inbox wording with files already uploaded.
Functions are limited and the message points to unfinished verification or a compliance queue.
KYC, repeat verification, and Source of FundsBinance rejected KYC, asked for a video check, or requested origin documents — including after a Uniswap-to-CEX deposit.
P2P dispute or counterparty complaintA hold after a P2P appeal. We do not merge that story with a DeFi deposit case.
Verification fails, device or login lockLiveness, an ID file, or a new device blocks access. Opening a second account to skip the review is not a path we take.
Binance decides whether to lift the restriction — that cannot be guaranteed in advance.
We do not forge documents or offer a KYC or AML bypass.
If there is no realistic path, we say so after the initial assessment.
UID, the notice text, and a list of files already uploaded are enough. Do not send seed phrases, private keys, passwords, or 2FA codes.
Binance UID and the exact KYC or restriction wording
Verification-screen and compliance-email screenshots
If the deposit came from DeFi: the DEX withdrawal TxID and the address that funded Binance
Source of Funds files Binance has already requested
A timeline: when KYC passed, when the new request appeared, what was sent
We separate a KYC rejection from SoF after DeFi and from a P2P hold, using the request that is open now.
We compare the Uniswap → wallet → Binance path with the amounts in the account and with what Binance already flagged.
One complete set for the current KYC or SoF request, without extra tickets “just in case”.
We help answer compliance clarifications and keep the correspondence in one ticket.
Timing is set by Binance’s queue and the completeness of the file set. One anonymized case took about 40 hours — that is not a promise.
After a Uniswap V3 withdrawal Binance restricted about $280,000. We built an on-chain origin tree and a compliance package for the exchange request.
Access was restored after the documents were reviewed. The same timeline is not promised.
Anonymized DefCrypt case. The outcome depends on the facts and on the exchange’s decision.
The price depends on the document volume and review complexity. Fixed-fee, hybrid, or success-fee terms may be available.
The initial assessment is free
Exact terms are determined after the case is reviewed
A success fee may be available for eligible larger cases
A second check can follow a new device, failed liveness, an expired ID, or a deposit that does not match the risk profile. Use the wording in the account, not chat-group advice.
No. Each exchange scores risk differently. In the published case the hold was lifted after an origin map, but Binance decides — not the mere fact that a DEX was involved.
How the amounts connect: where the asset came from, which addresses it passed, and how income is shown. For DeFi that often means a TxID and a pool explanation, not only a selfie.
No. We prepare facts and a complete file set. The outcome cannot be guaranteed: Binance decides.
Yes — an anonymized matter of about $280,000 after Uniswap is published separately. It is not a template or a timeline promise.