AML/KYC restriction after support stopped responding
We identified the restriction trigger, assembled Proof of Funds documents, and prepared a structured submission to the compliance team instead of sending generic complaints to support.
An exchange froze an account or restricted access. We examined the cause, assembled the supporting materials, and worked toward a resolution. Each case shows the platform, amount, timeline, and outcome.
A similar case does not guarantee the same outcome. Every matter is assessed individually.
We identified the restriction trigger, assembled Proof of Funds documents, and prepared a structured submission to the compliance team instead of sending generic complaints to support.
Cases are grouped by issue so you can find a comparable situation more quickly. Published cases have a detailed page; the others link to the relevant service.
AML, KYC, Source of Funds, DeFi, P2P, and disputed trading restrictions.
We reviewed 847 transactions and prepared a blockchain-forensics report and source-of-funds explanations for specialist compliance review.
The restrictions were lifted after the materials were escalated for specialist review.
We mapped the on-chain source of funds following a DeFi deposit and prepared a compliance package explaining the legitimate basis of the transaction.
The account restrictions were lifted after the forensic materials were submitted.
We identified the technical reason for four rejections, reorganized the documents to meet the verification requirements, and used a specialist channel instead of standard support.
Identity verification was completed and withdrawal access was restored.
We reconstructed the trading history, documented the market-making strategy, and submitted an appeal through Gate.io's compliance channel.
The restrictions were lifted and access to the account was restored.
We distinguished the client's actions from the counterparty risk, assembled evidence that the transaction was made in good faith, and submitted the case to MEXC compliance.
The account was unfrozen and the client withdrew the funds.
Cases where an attack was already in progress and control had to be restored quickly.
The authorized account holder was verified, the account was secured after the SIM was reassigned, and the security setup was changed before the attacker could withdraw the funds.
Control was restored; no unauthorized withdrawal took place.
We focus on the relevant facts and do not publish client names.
The platform, amount, timeline, and outcome come from the underlying case.
Personal data is not published.
A similar situation does not guarantee the same result or timeline.