How to Check a Crypto Exchange Before Signing Up

Checking a crypto exchange before you sign up takes less time than recovering from a deposit to a scheme. Type the domain yourself, verify the licence in the named regulator’s register, confirm the legal entity, test a small withdrawal, and inspect the support channel—and separately filter “guaranteed yield.” An AML hold at a major platform asks for documents in a ticket, not a transfer “for tax.” If the account already demands an extra payment to withdraw, see fake crypto exchanges. If a legitimate account is stuck, see exchange account unfreezing.
Why check the venue before the first deposit
People pick an exchange from an ad, a chat referral, or a low fee—and mix two risks. First: the venue was built to take deposits and disappear, or to block withdrawals until you pay extra. Second: it is a real centralized exchange that must apply AML / KYC / Source of Funds pauses. The checklist below reduces both; it does not cancel the second. A major exchange can still request documents after a deposit even if you “did everything right.”
A check before registration does not replace wallet hygiene and does not mean withdrawals will always go through. It filters an obvious fake before a large transfer. If someone already steered you in a chat to an “exchange like Binance,” read crypto exchange scams and do not open an account through someone else’s link.
Checklist: domain, licence, withdrawal, support
- Type the domain yourself, save it, and check the certificate and spelling: one character or a look-alike letter is a typical clone.
- Find the legal entity, registration number, and jurisdiction; match them in the official register of the country the site cites.
- Look up the licence in the named regulator’s register, not on a “licensed” banner. A regulator warning is a stop, not “everyone says that.”
- Read the public AML terms: what triggers a review and which documents they expect—not a promised timeline, but a coherent text.
- Before a large amount, run a cycle: small deposit, then small withdrawal. The fee is taken from the balance when the order is processed; a separate transfer to “unlock” funds is not required.
- Support should be a ticket or official email on the same domain. Telegram-only contact with no legal entity and no ticket is a warning sign.
Also compare claimed volumes with an independent aggregator and look for repeated withdrawal complaints on third-party sites, not on the exchange’s own page. “Too good” yield, a steadily rising balance, and a referral programme that pays like a salary sit closer to a scheme than to a spot market. Anonymized reviews without promises are in case studies.
Fake extra-payment trap vs an AML pause at a real exchange
The critical test is what blocks the withdrawal. A scheme almost always asks for a new transfer to an outside address—a “tax,” “fee,” or “liquidity payment.” A legitimate exchange asks for a passport, selfie, or SoF in an official ticket and does not ask for crypto “so the system can open.” Access is through a domain you keep yourself, not a message from a “manager.”
| Sign | Fake platform | Real exchange |
|---|---|---|
| Withdrawal block | Extra payment to an external address | Documents in a ticket (KYC / SoF) |
| Domain | Chat link, near-brand clone | Known address typed by hand |
| Yield | “Guarantee” and a smooth upward curve | Market prices, fees, drawdowns |
| Support | The same chat as the “mentor” | In-account ticket |
| Licence | Banner with no register entry | Record at the named regulator |
If a withdrawal is categorically impossible without another payment, this is a scheme; see fake exchanges and withdrawal fees. If you are already in an official account at a major platform and see a review status with no external payment demand, do not “fix” it by sending funds to search-result specialists. Typical reasons for genuine restrictions are in the top reasons accounts are frozen.
What not to do after the “check”
- Do not register through a messenger link, even if it is “easier for KYC.”
- Do not treat a test withdrawal as proof that a large withdrawal will pass without SoF.
- Do not treat reviews on the venue’s own site as an independent source.
- Do not enter a seed phrase to “verify the wallet with the exchange”—that is not how exchanges work.
If you skipped the check and the deposit is already inside: for a fake, stop extra payments and preserve TxIDs; for a live ticket at a known exchange, send one coherent document package. The second path is exchange account unfreezing, with no promised timeline or outcome.
Risks and limitations
- Checking the domain and licence does not prevent an AML hold at a real exchange after a deposit.
- A small test withdrawal does not mean a large withdrawal will pass without Source of Funds documents.
- A cloned domain and a chat link can look like a real exchange until the first large withdrawal.
- An extra “withdrawal” payment to an outside address almost always increases the loss without unlocking funds.
- Licence registers and platform policies change; verify the primary source, not an ad screenshot.
Sources used
- FCA — Warning List of unauthorised firms
- FBI IC3 — Investment Fraud (crypto platforms, fees, guaranteed returns)
- FTC — How to avoid cryptocurrency scams
- DefCrypt exchange-unfreeze practice (fake venue vs AML pause before deposit, anonymized)